I have been a graduate student for almost six years now and am finally getting to the place where I can share my professional knowledge with students and colleagues alike. John Fish has been a great mentor to me, and has helped me to find my feet in the academic world. I am a graduate student in biochemistry and am currently the Chair of the Biology department.
John Fish harvard is a very interesting professor, but I have to say that I really had no idea what I was getting myself into when I first met him. He was so well organized, so smart, and most importantly, so generous and kind to me. I don’t even know what I would do if I wasn’t a graduate student, and I feel fortunate to have such a wonderful and caring professor in my life. He is a truly great person.
I do think John Fish harvard is a very interesting professor, but I also think that many of the things he teaches are too abstract for most people to fully understand. His work on the physiology of the brain was an extremely interesting way to study the brain, and is still very relevant to our understanding of psychology and the way we interact with other people. I still think he is an extremely good professor, but I also worry that too much of his work is just too abstract.
I’m not really sure where John Fish harvard fits in with the rest of the top professors at UMass, Harvard, MIT, Yale, Princeton, Columbia, and the like. It’s interesting to look at the way he teaches but it’s also very hard to get your head around. I like the one that teaches on the physiology of the brain, but I don’t really like his teaching on the brain (I don’t think it’s that interesting either).
In a way I find it a bit odd that Fish harvard teaches so much neurobiology. What he teaches is very abstract and he teaches it in such a way that is difficult to really grasp. I think he is a very smart guy but I dont think that he really knows what he is talking about.
I think Fish harvard is a very smart guy, but he definitely doesn’t know what he is talking about. He does seem to have a very good understanding of the brain, but his teaching is more of a hunch than anything concrete. I also don’t know if you’re aware that Fish harvard teaches a lot of his course on the “brain in a vat.
Fish harvard is a cognitive neuroscientist who has studied the brain for years. I think his teaching is a bit random and very abstract but his approach to communicating his findings is very accessible and understandable. His teaching of the brain is something that any interested person can follow and apply to their own lives.
Fish harvard has a lot of great things going for him in my eyes. He studies the brain like it’s a computer. He makes his data as accessible as possible. As the brain is the first organ in the body to be turned over, it has a lot of functions that are essential to life. Like, for instance, the brain’s role in consciousness. Like he makes that a lot more concrete and accessible than most cognitive neuroscientists and neuropharmacologists would.
Fish harvard will probably be the first person in history to ever be able to make a pill without using a biological process. To do this he’s going to have to develop a drug that lets him turn his brain into a computer running a program the way a human brain does. All the while he’ll be able to read information about himself written in the brain’s own code, like your own neurons.
This is the part where people who are not scientists and neuroscientists are going to start to question the science. But the way Fish harvard plans to make a pill that lets him turn his brain into a computer is by implanting a chip in his head, which is a process that can take months to accomplish.